Advertisement
Surgical technique| Volume 6, ISSUE 4, P911-913, December 2020

Protection of the Femoral Trunnion During Acetabular Revision Hip Surgery—A Novel Technique

Open AccessPublished:November 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.015

      Abstract

      Revision of a failed acetabular component in the presence of an intact femoral prosthesis comprises approximately 20% of revision total hip replacements performed by the senior author. During this procedure, the femoral trunnion is at risk of damage because of scratching from retractors, reamers, or other instruments. Scratching can result in mechanically assisted crevice corrosion or adverse local-tissue reaction or trunnionosis leading to implant failure. We have used a variety of techniques for protection of the femoral taper over the last 30 years. We describe our current method of taper protection, using a cut segment of #5 silicon laryngeal airway, which is a simple and effective method.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion or adverse local-tissue reaction [
      • Mcgrory B.J.
      • Joshua J.J.
      • Young M.K.
      • Fillingham Y.
      Standardizing terms for tribocorrosion-associated adverse local tissue reaction in total hip arthroplasty.
      ], previously known as trunnionosis, is defined as wear and corrosion of the femoral head neck taper interface [
      • Rehmer A.
      • Bishop N.E.
      • Morlock M.M.
      Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses.
      ] and has been acknowledged as a growing cause of total hip arthroplasty failure [
      • Pastides P.S.
      • Dodd M.
      • Sarraf K.M.
      • Willis-Owen C.A.
      Trunnionosis: a pain in the neck.
      ]. It is believed to be a synergistic combination of factors and involves both fretting corrosion and crevice corrosion [
      • Jacobs J.J.
      • Gilbert J.L.
      • Urban R.M.
      Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants.
      ]. The trunnion should be rinsed, cleaned, and dried carefully, while avoiding any contamination of the bore before assembly. Biological debris, and even residual water, might critically reduce the fixation of the taper connection between the head and the neck [
      • Rieker C.B.
      • Wahl P.
      What the surgeon can do to reduce the risk of trunnionosis in hip arthroplasty: recommendations from the literature.
      ].
      Revision hip arthroplasty consisting of both components accounts for approximately 41% of procedures, whereas isolated cup-only revisions including liner exchange account for about 26% [
      • Katz J.N.
      • J Wright E.
      A wright and E losina failures of total hip replacement: a population-based perspective.
      ]. One of the most difficult problems with isolated acetabular revision surgery or liner exchange is getting adequate exposure without damaging the femoral trunnion. The anterior and posterior acetabular wall retractors can scratch the trunnion leading to mechanically assisted crevice corrosion, which can be of various degrees as described by Goldberg et al [
      • Goldberg J.R.
      • Gilbert J.L.
      • Jacobs J.J.
      • Bauer T.W.
      • Paprosky W.
      • Leurgans S.
      A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.
      ] [Table 1]. Thus, it is important to avoid superficial scratching or damage to the femoral trunnion and to prevent its contamination from debris and even blood, which could lead to failure of the implant [
      • Rehmer A.
      • Bishop N.E.
      • Morlock M.M.
      Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses.
      ,
      • Cooper H.J.
      • Della Valle C.J.
      • Berger R.A.
      • et al.
      Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.
      ,
      • Banerjee S.
      • Cherian J.J.
      • Bono J.V.
      • et al.
      Gross Trunnion failure after primary total hip arthroplasty.
      ].
      Table 1Criteria for corrosion and fretting scores by Goldberg et al. [
      • Goldberg J.R.
      • Gilbert J.L.
      • Jacobs J.J.
      • Bauer T.W.
      • Paprosky W.
      • Leurgans S.
      A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.
      ].
      Severity of corrosion and frettingScoreCriteria
      None1No visible corrosion observed

      No visible signs of fretting observed
      Mild2<30% of taper surface discolored or dull

      Single band or bands of fretting scars involving 3 or fewer machine lines on the taper surface
      Moderate3>30% of the taper surface discolored or dull, or <10% of the taper surface containing black debris, pits, or etch marks

      Several bands of fretting scars or a single band involving more than 3 machine lines
      Severe4>10% of the taper surface containing black debris, pits, or etch marks

      Several bands of fretting scars involving several adjacent machine lines, or flattened areas with nearby fretting scars
      Over a 30-year period, we have used various methods for intraoperative trunnion protection. The most recent technique uses a cut segment of #5 silicon laryngeal airway that is applied directly over the femoral trunnion. We have found this to be a safe and reliable as well as a simple intraoperative technique. We describe this in detail.

      Operative technique

      We use a mini-posterior approach, but the technique is applicable to all surgical approaches. After dislocation of the hip, the femoral head is removed and the taper inspected and cleaned. A 1-inch segment of #5 laryngeal airway is applied directly over the Morse taper (Fig. 1). This tubing seems to fit snugly for tapers ranging from 11/13, 12/14, to even rarely 14/16. It is less tight on the smaller tapers such as V40.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Silicon laryngeal airway #5 and its cut segment applied to the femoral taper.
      For the posterior approach, the femoral prosthesis is then retracted anteriorly into a subgluteal pocket. A curved Hohmann retractor is placed anterior to the acetabulum with the femoral component levered behind it. The silicon sleeve protects the trunnion from metal-on-metal contact and scratching in spite of leverage directly by the instruments (Fig. 2).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Intraoperative photograph of femoral taper protection with the laryngeal airway sleeve.

      Discussion

      Protection of the femoral trunnion is the important aspect of isolated acetabular revision. By avoiding damage to the femoral trunnion, we avoid the risk of mismatch of the mating surfaces, corrosion, and particle generation [
      • Cook S.D.
      • BarrackRL
      • Baffes G.C.
      • et al.
      Wear and corrosionofmodular interfacesin total hip replacement.
      ,
      • Lieberman J.R.
      • Rimnac C.M.
      • Garvin K.L.
      • Klein R.W.
      • Salvati E.A.
      Ananalysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses.
      ].
      There have been various methods described to provide femoral taper protection including cotton swab covers, multiple rubber finger stalls, and simple syringes. We have had experience with all these methods and have found the laryngeal airway technique to be the easiest and most effective [
      • Puolakka T.
      • Halonen P.
      • Oksa J.
      • et al.
      Protection of femoral neck taper in revision of acetabular component.
      ,
      • Neil M.J.
      • Solomon M.I.
      A technique of revision of failed acetabular components leaving the femoral component in situ.
      ].
      A #5 laryngeal airway is available in most modern operating theaters, is easily cut using a scalpel blade, remains stable on most femoral tapers, and is resilient to avoid tearing or breakage. We have used this technique in more than 100 cases without failure.

      Summary

      We consider that the aforementioned procedure is an inexpensive and simple solution for the complicated problem and strongly recommend to be used during all liner exchange and acetabular cup-only revision total hip replacement surgeries.

      Conflict of interests

      N. Vertzyas receives royalties from Corin (Paragon collar royalties) and is a paid consultant for Corin (robotic knee platform); M.J. Neil receives royalties from Global Paragon hip prosthesis and Global Orthopaedic Technology, Australia, and is a paid consultant for Global Orthopaedic Technology, Australia; and A.C. Kawalkar declares no potential conflicts of interest.

      Supplementary data

      References

        • Mcgrory B.J.
        • Joshua J.J.
        • Young M.K.
        • Fillingham Y.
        Standardizing terms for tribocorrosion-associated adverse local tissue reaction in total hip arthroplasty.
        Arthroplasty Today. 2020; 6: 196
        • Rehmer A.
        • Bishop N.E.
        • Morlock M.M.
        Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses.
        Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012; 27: 77
        • Pastides P.S.
        • Dodd M.
        • Sarraf K.M.
        • Willis-Owen C.A.
        Trunnionosis: a pain in the neck.
        World J Orthop. 2013; 4: 161
        • Jacobs J.J.
        • Gilbert J.L.
        • Urban R.M.
        Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 268
        • Rieker C.B.
        • Wahl P.
        What the surgeon can do to reduce the risk of trunnionosis in hip arthroplasty: recommendations from the literature.
        Materials (Basel). 2020; 13: 1950
        • Katz J.N.
        • J Wright E.
        A wright and E losina failures of total hip replacement: a population-based perspective.
        Orthop J Harvard Med Sch. 2007; 9: 101106
        • Goldberg J.R.
        • Gilbert J.L.
        • Jacobs J.J.
        • Bauer T.W.
        • Paprosky W.
        • Leurgans S.
        A multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prostheses.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; : 149
        • Cooper H.J.
        • Della Valle C.J.
        • Berger R.A.
        • et al.
        Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 1655
        • Banerjee S.
        • Cherian J.J.
        • Bono J.V.
        • et al.
        Gross Trunnion failure after primary total hip arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 641
        • Cook S.D.
        • BarrackRL
        • Baffes G.C.
        • et al.
        Wear and corrosionofmodular interfacesin total hip replacement.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 298: 80
        • Lieberman J.R.
        • Rimnac C.M.
        • Garvin K.L.
        • Klein R.W.
        • Salvati E.A.
        Ananalysis of the head-neck taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 300: 162
        • Puolakka T.
        • Halonen P.
        • Oksa J.
        • et al.
        Protection of femoral neck taper in revision of acetabular component.
        J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 497
        • Neil M.J.
        • Solomon M.I.
        A technique of revision of failed acetabular components leaving the femoral component in situ.
        J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11: 482