x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Surgical Techniques
- RevisionRemove Revision filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2015 and 2022.
Author
- Abetz, Jeremy1
- Adib, Farshad1
- Adil, Syed Ali1
- Anderson, Lucas1
- Auñón, Álvaro1
- Boes, Emily1
- Bullock, Matthew1
- Calvo, Emilio1
- Caughran, Alexander1
- Corces, Arturo1
- Cusano, Antonio1
- Endrizzi, Donald1
- English, Shaun1
- Farinelli, Luca1
- Ferguson, David1
- Gigante, Antonio Pompilio1
- Gililland, Jeremy1
- Gopinath, Rohan1
- Halawi, Mohamad J1
- Harrington, Melvin A1
- Hooper, Matthew1
- Hunter, Mitchell1
- Johnson, Aaron1
- Judd, Hyrum1
- Kocher, Timothy1
Keyword
- Arthroplasty3
- Total hip arthroplasty3
- Hip2
- Infection2
- Knee2
- Total knee arthroplasty2
- Cement removal1
- Ceramic1
- Conversion1
- Cup-cage1
- Custom-made metaphyseal tibial cone1
- Debris1
- Direct anterior approach1
- Explant1
- Fracture1
- Hardware removal1
- Hip arthrodesis1
- Knee: primary1
- Metal cemover1
- Opioids1
- PJI1
- Prediction1
- Robotic surgery1
- Saw1
Surgical Techniques
10 Results
- Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Direct Anterior Cup-Half Cage for Revision and Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 16p140–149Published online: June 7, 2022- Alex Lancaster
- Emily Boes
- Jeremy Gililland
- Lucas Anderson
Cited in Scopus: 0As surgeons' comfort with the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty continues to increase, there is a growing interest in performing complex surgeries through this approach. Acetabular bone loss and/or pelvic discontinuity in the primary or revision setting often requires specialized implants such as a cup-cage construct. We describe our surgical technique for implanting modified cup-half cages through the DAA and show 2 case examples of how this technique was utilized in the setting of complex acetabular bone loss. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Utilizing a Prefabricated Antibiotic-Impregnated Articular Spacer Combined With an Intramedullary Device for Significant Femoral Bone Loss in Periprosthetic Hip Infection
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 15p174–179Published online: May 18, 2022- Justin Stafford
- Mitchell Hunter
- Hyrum Judd
- Arturo Corces
Cited in Scopus: 0Periprosthetic joint infection can be a devastating complication following total hip arthroplasty, which often requires a lengthy treatment course that is fraught with complications. There are various types of antibiotic-impregnated spacers that can be used to treat periprosthetic hip infections, with articulating spacers being utilized frequently with the goal of preserving patient range of motion and functionality. Many of these articulating spacers have pre-set sizes and stem options, which accommodate the majority of patients. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Tibial Tubercle Screw Fixation on Custom Metaphyseal Cone: Surgical Tip in Severe Metaphyseal Tibia Bone Loss
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 15p93–97Published online: April 23, 2022- Gianluca Piovan
- Luca Farinelli
- Daniele Screpis
- Lorenzo Povegliano
- Antonio Pompilio Gigante
- Claudio Zorzi
Cited in Scopus: 0Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) facilitates exposure in knee arthroplasty revision. However, it comes with complications, especially if it invades the intramedullary canal. Most revisions are characterized by compromised femur and/or tibia bone stock, and the use of metaphyseal cones or sleeves for implant fixation has become increasingly frequent. Several methods of fixation of the tibial tubercle have been proposed, such as screw fixation, cerclage wiring, and suture repair. Despite screws providing the strongest fixation for TTO, their placement around a tibial intramedullary stem or a metaphyseal tibial cone may be difficult. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Surgical Technique of a Cement-On-Cement Removal System for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Revision Surgery
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 9p112–117Published online: June 14, 2021- Miguel Tovar-Bazaga
- David Sáez-Martínez
- Álvaro Auñón
- Felipe López-Oliva
- Belén Pardos-Mayo
- Emilio Calvo
Cited in Scopus: 1Cement removal during hip or knee arthroplasty revision surgery is technically demanding and prone to severe complications such as periprosthetic fractures, incomplete cement removal, or perforations. Several alternative techniques have been developed to enable complete, accurate, and safe removal of cement from bone, including osteotomies and cortical windows, endoscopic instruments, ultrasound devices, lithotripsy, and laser-assisted removal. We describe a cement-on-cement technique with a sterile, single-use tool for cement removal. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Conversion of Hip Arthrodesis Using Robotic Arm Technology
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 9p40–45Published online: April 27, 2021- Syed Ali Adil
- Matthew Hooper
- Timothy Kocher
- Alexander Caughran
- Matthew Bullock
Cited in Scopus: 1Recent advancements in computer-assisted surgery have led to a renewed interest in robotic-assisted hip arthroplasty. This technology assists with component position which is especially useful in prior trauma or dysplasia cases. We present a case of a surgical hip fusion conversion to total hip arthroplasty with the use of robotic-assisted technology. Enhanced preoperative planning with the ability to manipulate implant position before execution can be invaluable during complex procedures. Further research is warranted before revision cases using computerized navigation systems becomes more prevalent. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Single-Sided Reciprocating Saw for Tibial Component Removal During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 8p128–131Published online: March 11, 2021- Rohan Gopinath
- Scott Koenig
- Aaron Johnson
- Farshad Adib
- Geoffrey Van Flandern
- Sumon Nandi
Cited in Scopus: 0Revision total knee arthroplasty often necessitates removing well-fixed components. Tibial tray removal is challenging becaue of 1) physical barriers posed by the component pegs, keel, or stem in accessing the implant-bone interface circumferentially and 2) proximity of vulnerable structures including the patellar tendon, collateral ligaments, popliteal artery, and distal femur. In this report, we present a step-by-step technique for removal of a well-fixed tibial component using a single-sided reciprocating saw. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Combating the Opioid Epidemic: Experience with a Single Prescription for Total Joint Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 6Issue 4p668–671Published online: August 23, 2020- Daniel Sun
- Antonio Cusano
- Melvin A. Harrington
- Mohamad J. Halawi
Cited in Scopus: 3Despite advances in perioperative total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pain protocols, opiates continue to play a major role in postoperative pain control. This brief communication reports our experience with a restrictive opioid protocol allowing patients only a single prescription of low-dose opioids. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
A Novel Method of Determining Acetabular Component Size to Guide Explant in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 6Issue 2p169–171Published online: April 24, 2020- Fiachra O Deasmhunaigh
- Jeremy Abetz
- Shaun English
- David Mitchell
- Biswadev Mitra
Cited in Scopus: 0Revision hip arthroplasty is a frequently performed procedure and is projected to increase annually. Removal of a well-fixed acetabular component can involve loss of much needed bone stock. Contemporary instruments allow acetabular removal with minimal morbidity; however, their use requires accurate knowledge of the component size. We describe a technique that allows sizing to be determined accurately, without specialized equipment, in situations where component details are unavailable. Our technique multiplies ratio of head:cup on pre-operative X-ray by the diameter of the index femoral head which is removed intra-operatively to predict index cup size. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Ultrasound gel minimizes third body debris with partial hardware removal in joint arthroplasty
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 3Issue 1p29–31Published online: November 16, 2016- Aidan C. McGrory
- Lee Replogle
- Donald Endrizzi
Cited in Scopus: 2Hundreds of thousands of revision surgeries for hip, knee, and shoulder joint arthroplasties are now performed worldwide annually. Partial removal of hardware during some types of revision surgeries may create significant amounts of third body metal, polymer, or bone cement debris. Retained debris may lead to a variety of negative health effects including damage to the joint replacement. We describe a novel technique for the better containment and easier removal of third body debris during partial hardware removal. - Surgical techniqueOpen Access
Extraction of a well fixed but fractured ceramic acetabular liner
Arthroplasty TodayVol. 1Issue 1p11–13Published in issue: March, 2015- David Ferguson
- Robert Metcalf
Cited in Scopus: 2Ceramic fractures have been reported to occur in hip replacements, but the techniques used to extract a well fixed but fractured component are not commonly described. We present a case of ceramic liner fracture and validate a modification of a previously reported extraction technique that allowed us to save the acetabular cup and insert a polyethylene liner. With an increasing trend in ceramic bearing usage, it is likely that the number of ceramic liner fractures will increase and therefore knowledge of successful extraction techniques will be desirable.